Insatiable UCLA Celebrity Snooper? 61 Records
After being informed last week that his wife's medical records had been accessed, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issued a statement saying that "a breach of any patient's medical records is outrageous."
AP News
April 07, 2008
LOS ANGELES – California first lady Maria Shriver is among more than 30 celebrities and other high-profile patients who had their confidential records breached at UCLA Medical Center, medical officials said.
The woman responsible, whose name was not released, is the same employee who sneaked into actress Farrah Fawcett’s medical records, officials told the Los Angeles Times on Sunday.
That worker was fired in May 2007 after UCLA learned of the widespread breaches, but patients were not notified, the hospital said.
In all, the woman improperly looked at 61 patients’ medical records in 2006 and 2007, according to state and local medical officials. These included Fawcett, Shriver, and 31 other politicians, celebrities and other well-known people, the paper said. Names of the other patients were not disclosed.
Farrah Fawcett’s records were peaked at at UCLA.
The head of the UCLA Hospital System, Dr. David Feinberg, apologized for the breaches and said the woman behind them had been a “rogue” employee.
Fawcett is battling cancer. Her attorney, Kim Swartz, said last week that after an employee at the hospital accessed Fawcett’s medical records, details about her treatment showed up in the National Enquirer.
Britney Spears was among those who’s medical records were breached at UCLA.
But Feinberg told the Times that the hospital reviewed the fired employee’s e-mails and phone calls and found no evidence any confidential medical information was shared inappropriately.
After being informed last week that his wife’s medical records had been accessed, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issued a statement saying that “a breach of any patient’s medical records is outrageous.” Besides being California’s first lady, Shriver is a former NBC newswoman and a member of the Kennedy family.
The secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency, Kim Belshe, said Sunday that her agency is “very concerned about what appears to be a pattern of repeated violations.”
The state will be taking action against UCLA, she said.
UCLA did not let state officials know about the breaches last year. Kathleen Billingsley of the Center for Healthcare Quality said a state investigator on Friday came across a document with the names of those patients affected.
Feinberg said hospital officials initially concluded that alerting authorities and the patients involved was not required. They are reconsidering whether to notify the patients because of the recent disclosures, he said.
The news of the snooping into Fawcett’s medical records became public on Wednesday, a few weeks after the hospital announced that several employees were fired for peeking at pop star’s Britney Spears’ files.
Schwarzenegger said he called on his administration to act after the Spears case became public last month.
© YellowBrix, Inc. Copyright 1997-2008
cuttie
7 months ago
482 comments
The hospital should be held accountable. They knew, about it, and should of notified the state. Now patient information, and the Goverment wife information, may be on the market for sale.
icrawford8
7 months ago
26 comments
Rogue or not That Nurse should have her license taken away.
vikie
7 months ago
2 comments
Every one's patient information should be confidential, the same thing happens here in NY State too. The billing department of the hospital and dr I have recieved care from for years, sent my personal information to my soon to be x husband of who I have been separated from for over 3 1/2 years now. This was after signing a paper stating that he and or his attorney are in no way to receive any information about me at all ever. My abusive x is now holding up the divorce, I need an attorney that knows how to handle this. Vikie
smileyald23
7 months ago
2 comments
I think it is great that they are taking this so seriously. Very inapproriate and action needs to be taken against the persons. I am not sure about the hospital. If they were aware of the activities taking place and not addressing it, then yes they are just as guilty.
beowulf
7 months ago
38 comments
Questions for you all: is this the act of one employee or a reflection of the corporate culture at the hospital? I remember reading recent articles regarding UCLA that multiple employees were disciplined or fired for looking at celebrity records? Is there a way to establish intent to pry or "oops, wrong key"?
vwoods
7 months ago
108 comments
Even though I do feel like it is the ultimate responsibility of the hospital to make sure that their employees are not going into things that they shouldn't, I think they should be going after the former employee as well; after all, she was the one that signed the confidentiality statement at the hospital.