News >> Browse Articles >> Scandals
Suit Claims Hospice Nurse Mistreated Newborn
Amy Givens / Newsday
August 20, 2008
Theresa Barth’s baby was born unable to see, hear, swallow or cry last October. The doctors told her that he would live a month, maybe.
But Barth was determined that as long as her baby, Michael Farrell, was not in pain, she wanted him to live.
Michael came home from Stony Brook University Hospital last December. Because Michael was not expected to live long, the hospital assigned a hospice nurse to help Barth care for her new son round the clock. But it didn’t take long for Barth, 30, of Mastic Beach, to find that she and the nurse, Donna Newhook, were at odds.
Now, Barth has filed a lawsuit seeking unspecified damages against Newhook and the Hospice Care Network of Woodbury in state Supreme Court in Mineola. She is seeking unspecified damages, saying the woman whom she trusted with her child was sabotaging her efforts to save him.
“The hospice took a difficult and tragic situation and made it even worse,” said Barth’s lawyer, Michael Levine of Franklin Square.
Lucy Rosen, a spokeswoman for the Hospice Care Network, said the agency does not comment on pending litigation. No working phone number for Newhook could be found.
Michael became brain-damaged when Barth’s placenta peeled away from the wall of her uterus, depriving Michael of oxygen and blood for some time before he was born Oct. 24. When Barth, who lost a lot of blood during the delivery, was finally well enough to see her son, the doctors explained that he would be unable to do anything for himself, Barth said.
Doctors gave Michael a 50 percent chance of living a year and a 15 percent chance of living two, Barth said. But she said they also conceded they couldn’t be sure of Michael’s future, so Barth and Michael’s father, Kevin Farrell, held out hope that with medical advances their child could someday have a meaningful life.
“He’ll never come out normal and I understand that,” said Barth, who gave up her job at Fidelity Investments in Westbury to look after Michael. “But as long as he’s healthy and he enjoys life, we feel that we have to do everything we can for him.”
Barth said she and Farrell made that clear to Newhook. That was why they were so surprised when the nurse didn’t act on their wishes, Barth said.
“She said I wasn’t God,” Barth recalled.
When the nurse went home, Barth sat on the floor, holding her infant son and sobbing.
But the struggle continued. Barth said Newhook poured Michael’s seizure medication into the sink, according to court documents. She canceled his doctor’s appointments, the suit said.
Newhook eventually called the state Office of Children and Family Services and said Barth was mistreating her son, according to court documents. A letter from that agency shows that the investigation found no wrongdoing by Barth or Farrell. After that, Barth said she complained to the hospice network, which sent a new nurse, but she also clashed with the family. Hospice care is overseen by the state Department of Health, but Barth said she was unaware of that.
Another home care nurse is now helping care for Michael. Barth said he now cries and reacts to her when she enters the room.
(c) YellowBrix 2008
kstiltner1
about 1 month ago
1326 comments
Poor family
supersmart
2 months ago
10 comments
I have worked in the nursing field for several years, and know the difference between the A Home Health and A Hospice Nurse. The department who made this decision should be punished too. My heart goes for that little baby and his parents.
ladybugbow
2 months ago
20 comments
First of all, who decided the baby was more suitable with a hospice nurse vs home health nurse? Were the parents aware that hospice does not provide heroic measures but rather comfort measures?
dianakaye
2 months ago
4 comments
If these two nurses licenses weren't revoked, there's something seriously wrong with the State Nursing Board. It's bad enough to do this to ANY patient, but a newborn child that the parents have made their decisions about? How dare they! I can't even imagine the thought crossing my mind to take it upon myself to do what they did. They were hired to "care" for that child, not try to "kill" him. They should be publicly flogged!!!!!!!!!!1
basiajune
2 months ago
72 comments
This is horrible. And I agree with other commenters. I actually work in the Home Health Department (I do the billing), but they should have assigned her a Home Care Nurse. A hospice nurse is really only for Professional Comfort because the patient IS DIEING. What the nurse did and said shouldn't have been done. But I am glad that they have a new nurse now that is caring for the baby and the baby is getting better with her care.
armstrongcj
2 months ago
96 comments
This is so sad. I am a mother and I would feel the same way. My heart goes out to the baby. I am glad that she has found someone that is treating the baby and her family with respect. I have to say that I do not think that the hospice nurse would have treated them like that but there is two sides of the story and we only see one.
normienurse
2 months ago
16 comments
The "You are not God" comment was also taken out of context. Maybe she said "...No one knows how long the baby will be on earth, only God knows and You are not God". We don't know all the facts yet. Hospice is a wonderful organization and has their place, as does home health care. Until all the facts are out, we shouldn't judge. My heart and concern is for the baby.
KidzRN
2 months ago
2 comments
A Private Duty Nurse
cnagrad08
2 months ago
2 comments
I am a cna and I work in a long term care facility and I sometimes see hospice in there and they make sure that the patient is comfortable during their dieing process. If her son wasn't actually dieing and just needed round the clock care to administer meds and stuff like that then she should have went with a home health nurse not hospice but I hope she has learned her lesson and put her sons care first and switched who cares for her son.
lgt777
2 months ago
2 comments
I agree with Lireland in that, if this nurse did say to the parent "you are not God", she would have been way out of line. A comment like that shows a lack of tack, professionalism and sensitivety to a very delicate situation [perhaps the nurse has some radical religiousl views spilling over into her professional life and she herself is playing God???]. The accusations that the nurse poured the meds down the drain and cancelled md appts was most likely false. The article does not make it clear as to why the nurse would have done that. After another nurse was sent by Hospice to the house, the mother also had an issue with the new nurse as well. Sounds like the mother/parents are just not able to deal with the possible impending death of their child. Filing a lawsuit isn't going to solve anything, just make a heartbreaking situation even more of the same. By publishing the nurse's name in the paper, the nurse's reputation is now in question.
laura59
3 months ago
414 comments
We all know that sometimes communication appears to be a lost art. It's possible the mother wasn't completely informed what Hospice does and the nurse could've been told it was a "routine" case. Who really knows? When emotions run high, the mouth opens and regretably, leaves a lasting impression. I hope her baby does well, now and in the future. Sometimes the media just need to stay home for the day and let people live their own lives without benefit of their (biased) "reporting". I often what the media would have to talk about if their current "story" had not occurred.
dugasa01
3 months ago
14 comments
Very interesting...Would love to read the outcome..
smoxignal
3 months ago
64 comments
Yes, I agree a Home Health Nurse would have been a better referral.
StephanieSmiles
3 months ago
6 comments
This is definitely heartbreaking but I have to agree with casassy.
tatianayvonne
3 months ago
8 comments
May god bless them all!