Group Forums >> McCain and Palin >> Obama's Administration
Obama's Administration
| back to top |
Posted about 1 month ago It would be interesting to see if any of the folk you find at www.MeetBarackObama.com would be in his administration and what that would be like. What do you all think? |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago this whole acorn thing is nuts (no pun, lol).....seriously, this man scares me. i shudder to think what may happen if he is elected into office. i truly feel as if the american people are being suckered. so many americans are so passionate about him. i can't understand this. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago You would think people would use the acorn thing to not vote, but that's kinda the theme here. He does not need to be in office. If that were McCain they would be crucifying him. If people actually think he's a saviour, stated on many talk shows. They are truly in for a rude awakening. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Did anybody see that town hall gathering when that guy yelled at McCain saying 'IM MAD, I WANT YOU TO GO GET HIM...........I DONT WANT THIS COUNTRY TURN INTO A SOCIALIST STATE'. Now that's not a direct quote, just the jist of what he was saying. These last 2 debates of his reminds me of ME in divorce court......for both divorces. I was meek and afraid to speak of the truly horrible things the spouses did such as the beatings, cheatings, cashing my child support checks and taking the slut out who went to swinger parties, buying a horse with the child support money and all that sort of wrong doings. McCain is like me in that he went into his shell and was scared to tell the judge <in that case, the judge was the public> of all the shiftless crooks Obama has surrounded him with. Obama's secretary of defense might be Ayers, his Sec of State might be Rev Wright, and the Treasury post might go to Raines. We all need to go to church every Sunday and Wednesday nite to pray for our country. If Obama wins, and the polls have him in the lead at this point, I think, we also need to pray for Obama to use good judgement and give him the courage to stand up for the right things to do for all of us as a nation. This is totally my opinion and mine alone! For those of you who dont know me except for my posts, maybe now you can see why I'm such a bitch. We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I for one will have a very difficult time supporting Obama if he wins November 4th. It is not merely his politics that I disagree with, it is his very character. He supports live birth abortions. Deny it, at your peril. The record speaks for itself. He says he did not know until recently what Ayers was up to and thought he (Ayers) had be rehabilitated. Obama was eight years old when Ayers bombed but he was not eight years old in 2001 when Ayers said he wished he had done more. Three of his top financial advisors are directly involved with the Freddie Mac/Fannie Mac issue and took millions in golden parachuits when the housing markent caved in. It is unfortunate that the FBI and SEC investigation will not be completed until far after the election. I was watching one of the news networks yesterday when it was mentioned that Obama has stayed clear pretty much of the debate of the financial issue of late. No wander, he is up to his forehead in it. It is unfortunate that Bush is taking the flack for it. Do people not realize that the President cannot do anything about the budget or financial mess but RECOMMEND it to congress. Congress holds the purse strings. They vote. They ratify or reject any proposal. The president can veto but congress can over ride a veto if they wish. Pelosi has a amazing amount of gall to blame the president. Bush (and yes McCain) warned about the dangers of the sub-prime issues 2 years ago). We as Americans need to wake up. We need to get her out of office along with anyone on the Hill not doing the job for the United States. Another thing that is amazing to me is Obama talking all the time about stopping lobbiests. Common, are the policitians that needy that they will do whatever a lobbiest wants if the lobbiest gives enough money or promises something. If our "dear" Representatives and Senators do not have the gumption to say "No thanks, I'm voting for the better of the country not for my pocket" then they have no business being in office. If they do not have the character to resign then vote their butts out of office. Poor, poor, congressman they can't pass up a bribe. Poor babies. There will always be lobbiests. That is just another of Obama's silver tongued lies. Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I'M WHITE, and I'm not voting for Barack Obama. To some people, that makes me a racist. Doesn't matter that I would never have voted for Hillary Clinton or John Edwards. The only thing that counts with the people who apparently count these things is that I'm a Caucasian turning my back on the junior senator from Illinois. Ever since the campaign entered its most frenetic stage, race has become the not-so-secret weapon of the Obama camp, allowing it to both promote the candidate as a historic step forward while at the same time attack his opponents with the bigot label. And the polls say that it seems to be working. I'm not saying that Obama will win or lose because of the color of his skin. He probably won't. But what Obama supporters have successfully done is skew the national discussion away from the issues and more toward a referendum on race. The Obama campaign has made it harder to talk about the economy, national security, health care, etc., without dragging in the murky and volatile factor that corrupts every debate. When John McCain supporters say, "Obama lacks experience," Obama's handlers say that's code for "Do you really want an unprepared black man running the government?" When we criticize his intent to sit down with dictators "without preconditions," they say it means "this black man doesn't really have our country's best interests at heart if he's willing to talk toour enemies." When Sarah Palin criticizes Obama for his ties to William Ayers by saying, "I'm afraid this is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to work with a former domestic terrorist," she's slammed as a racist. If Colin Powell were on the Democratic ticket, McCain might lose half his base. I, for one, would vote for Colin Powell over McCain in a skinny minute. It's the candidate, not his color, that turns a lot of us off. Yes, there are bigots - of every color and ethnicity. But they're not the majority by a long shot. I doubt Obama condones these tactics. As he's said on many occasions, he wanted to transcend race in this campaign. And as a man raised in large part by his white grandparents, I believe him. But this race thing is bigger than whatever Obama intended. It's taken on a life of its own. There have been many times during a conversation with an Obama supporter when I've seen a noticeable change in demeanor after they've realized they can't change my vote. Incapable of believing that someone would vote for any Republican post-Bush, even one hated by many in his own party, they whip out that trusty race card. Interestingly, we're not allowed to acknowledge that the card has two faces. Every time some intrepid pundit mentions the fact that nine out of 10 blacks are voting for Obama, the reaction is swift and furious: Blacks are voting issues, not pigmentation. I'm willing to believe that's true, especially when you consider that blacks are overwhelmingly Democratic. They've been voting for that way ever since the Republicans forgot it was the true architect of emancipation.Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. Democrats have long claimed (and often abused) the loyalty of African-Americans, so we would expect that a black Democratic candidate would garner the support of most black voters because they identify with his politics, not just his color. Race is an issue in this campaign. But to accuse supporters of McCain of racism is a slap in everyone's face. Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I've mentioned this before in other forums, and I agree with you prettykitty. I am a WHITE woman, who DOES NOT support Obama. I am married to a black man, and I don't mean light skinned!!! LOL My children are bi-racial. Not supporting Obama does NOT make me a racist, nor do I feel it makes any non minority individual a racist. It simply means I cannot support an individual who does not respect the life of the unborn, or the newly born for that matter. I do not support him based on his moral and ethical stances, or lack thereof. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago The McCain campaign just released a new ad outlining Obama’s association with ACORN. I wonder why they left out the fact that Obama, the lawyer, represented ACORN in a “motor voter” case in 1995. So…Obama worked for ACORN, represented ACORN, and hired ACORN. So much for THIS “Fight the Smears” lie: Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago When is McCain going to get tough? My dream team if McCain wins this election would be Rudy Juiliani for Attorney General, Fred Townsend for Sec of State, and Romney for Sec of Treasury or budget director. I'd also like to see Gov. Huckabee do something to help the passing of the 'fair tax' law, not sure how that would fit into that cabiniet! My first wish of this dream team would be for Juiliani prosecute everybody who took a cut from Fannie Mae and Freddi Mac, then follow up with the alledged association of Obama with Acorn and voter fraud. He <McCain> has got to get tough at the last debate. His supporters aren't going to vote for Obama, I dont think, but what if they just choose NOT to vote? To choose not to vote is a vote for the 'other guy'. We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago angienwgeorgia says ...
You are my Hero, Love Juliani. He cleaned up NYC and got rid of the crap. I hope people do vote and that they do not write in, that is also a waste. Either way, I think we are screwed. More so if Obama comes in. Did you see that video. It will happen.... |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago No link to ACORN?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/2007obama_promises_to_g... Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago "SOMEONE yelled" off with his (Obama's) head. I didn't realize that one person quoting the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland meant that the GOP was committing a crime against humanity. And one idiot holding a sign that connected our messiah with a terrorist? Yes, there are some GOP nincompoops out there. Does anyone wonder what kind of ignoramuses are on the fringes of Obama rallies? Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I remeber the 60's - the college left would invite any America hating radical to spew hatred on camous, encourage bombngs and murder of police.officers. But let a conservative speaker appear and they would disrupt the speech and drive him away. In other words, the anthem of the left has always been "Freedom Of Speech! Unless you disagree with us." And yes I am a veteran and was called a "Baby Killer." |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Yeah, Remember that "movie" that was released right after George Bush took office showing him being assassinated? It was depicted as George Bush was going to give a news conferance and was shot. The producer made it look a real news cast. I am NOT advocating this. This kind of thing is wrong no matter which cooks do it, BUT............... Wander what would happen if someone made a movie if Obama is elected and is shown to be assasinated? A cruel, dispicable thing for the bleeding heart liberals to do against Bush but I guess he was fair game because Bush is a conservative. Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago The movie of Bush had to be a Michael Moore Movie The bleeding heart liberals. Everyone is so into Clinton's idea, if it feels good do it.... Its a shame. The conservatives are afraid to speak out because you get black balled for having morals. We need to support the movie "The American Carol" It is a conservative movie. A spoof to Michael Moore's idiot ways. They are not publicizing this movie and they are making the hours inconvenient for most people to go to. The liberal papers want to write their tabloid stuff here in DFW area. They will not review it but they are reviewing a religious movie Religulous. It is about atheisim. What the heck is wrong with people. I am getting angry |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Lisa42 says ...
|
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago W. is by Martin Scorsesi or however you spell it. He hates our country, and his movies on vietnam portrayed our soldiers as potheads amd baby killers. I tend to confuse the hollywood leaders who hate America myself...........easy mistake to make, Lisa, because there are so many of them. During the last election they showed several actors for Kerry ............... I remember the one where Sarah Jessica Parker did this lttle jig in a skimpy outfit saying 'A VOTE FOR KERRY IS A VOTE FOR AMERICA'. I also remember Julia Roberts saying "if Bush wins the election, I'm moving to Canada!"..................geez, I dont remember seeing her in the tabloids packing up. Why do people worship those hollywood idols so much that they think THEIR opinion is the right opinion? Gotta admit, Matt Damon and Ben Afflect are nice looking, but they are actors............they 'act'. I'm a movie buff mysself, love good flicks. None of my friends have ever spent a nickel on a single Michael Moore flick........there might be somebody who watched an illegal 'pirate' version of it...........sure wouldnt blame anybody for not wanting to spend money on crap like that! We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago kayakrn7 says ...
Before "W" there was the "'movie" made by Michael Moore depicting George Bush being shot to death during a speech. It was not a comedy. It was basically calling for Bush to be assassinated. It was sick! Any American should be outraged for some movie to be made depicting the assassination of ANY American President regardless of his/her politics. Made me ill watching it. Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago kayakrn7 says ...
Sorry Oliver Stone directed it, so he's just as big as an idiot. I didn't come on here to be ridiculed. Look back..... I don't want this to start again |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago As Chicago (and Illinois, for that matter) reels from a fiscal crisis resulting in a cutback of services and layoffs of thousands, Mayor Daley spends many millions on public relations and image building.
Fired workers-the little people? Services being shut down? Infrastructure crumbling? School kids ripped off?
Ahh..who cares..as long as the public realtions machine and image building can flourish in the hands of people who make it their job to create illusions and delusions? Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago W. the Movie is by Oliver Stone (another left wing director, SHOCKER). And Josh Brolin plays W, son of James Brolin and stepson of Barbra Streisand (another shocker, not). I'm not wasting my money on this. As far as people following Obama like he's God, I look at him as the Pied Piper leading America into the river. Too many questions about his character, the company he has kept in the past, sitting in Rev. Wright's church for 20 years while he spewed garbage and said "God damn America", etc, etc, etc. If John McCain was doing this, the blatant liberal press would be all OVER him. Obama gets a free pass due to the damn media. People can bitch about FoxNews all they want but at least I get to hear something besides liberal soundbites from Brokaw and the like! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago DEATH OF A PRESIDENT “DEATH OF A PRESIDENT” is conceived as a fictional TV documentary broadcast in 2008, reflecting on another monstrously despicable and cataclysmic event: the assassination of President George W. Bush on October 19th, 2007. The “documentary” combines archival footage and carefully composed interviews, presented in a respectful and dignified manner. Exciting and questioning, it refashions the event into a riveting story. The film opens with the ferocious energy of a Tarantino or Oliver Stone movie, as frenetically edited archival footage thrusts us into a raging crowd of protesters, waiting for President Bush’s procession. The President is portrayed as a sympathetic and likable man–beloved by those close to him and charming to his followers. As the President gives a patriotic speech inside a hotel, the demonstrators’ fury increases to the breaking point. The tension mounts until the horrible instant where the President is assassinated. After the assassination, the film shifts into the style of a mystery, and follows the FBI’s hunt for the assassin. All the suspects are interviewed except one ½the Syrian man who is convicted and put on death row. There is much circumstantial evidence against him. But is he guilty of the crime? Or does his being Middle Eastern provide a convenient excuse to label the death of the President as an Act of Terror? The film's most startling and resonant trick, assembling the heart of its staged reality out of actual news footage. Early on, there are clips of demonstrators who line the streets chanting ''Chicago hates Bush!'' as the narrator describes a mood of despair that has fermented into chaos and collective fury. Death of a President hits the zeitgeist jackpot; it roots itself in an all too timely mood of souring national rage. The movie, which begins in 2007, shows us President Bush arriving at the airport and addressing the partisan Economic Club of Chicago in a jokey speech that touches on North Korea's nuclear ambitions, then joining a crowd of participants for an informal rope-line meet and greet. The director, Gabriel Range, who has made a number of dramas in documentary form for British television, forges a grainy, newsreel, believe-your-eyes verisimilitude, a technique that works stunningly well right up through the assassination, in which a flash of blood and a subliminal glimpse of the president's crumpling body evoke both the dawn-of-the-media-age horror of the shooting of Lee Harvey Oswald and the attempted assassination of President Reagan. A jolting close-up of Dick Cheney as he delivers Bush's eulogy in eerily precise detail will make you wonder how the filmmakers brought it off. (They used a clip of Cheney from Reagan's funeral, digitally fudging a few words.) Here is the link to this dispicable "documentary" if you can bear to watch it. Tell me if this doesn't look real. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-383900990793045743
Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Convicted felon Tony Rezko. Unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. And the race-baiting Rev. Jeremiah Wright. It is hard to think of any presidential candidate before Barack Obama sporting associations with three more execrable characters. Yet, let the McCain campaign raise the issue, and the mainstream media begin fulminating about dirty campaigning tinged with racism and McCarthyite guilt by association. But associations are important. They provide a significant insight into character. They are particularly relevant in relation to a potential president as new, unknown, opaque and self-contained as Obama. With the economy overshadowing everything, it may be too late politically to be raising this issue. But that does not make it, as conventional wisdom holds, in any way illegitimate. McCain has only himself to blame for the bad timing. He should have begun challenging Obama's associations months ago, before the economic meltdown allowed the Obama campaign (and the mainstream media, which is to say the same thing) to dismiss the charges as an act of desperation by the trailing candidate. McCain had his chance back in April, when the North Carolina Republican Party ran a gubernatorial campaign ad that linked Obama with Jeremiah Wright. The ad was duly denounced as racist by the New York Times and other deep thinkers. This was patently absurd. Racism is treating people differently and invidiously on the basis of race. Had any white presidential candidate had a close 20-year association with a white preacher overtly spreading race hatred from the pulpit, that candidate would have been not just universally denounced and deemed unfit for office, but also written out of polite society entirely. Nonetheless, John McCain, in his infinite wisdom, and with his overflowing sense of personal rectitude, joined the braying mob in denouncing that perfectly legitimate ad, saying it had no place in any campaign. In doing so, McCain unilaterally disarmed himself, rendering off-limits Obama's associations, an issue that even Hillary Clinton addressed more than once. Obama's political career was launched with Ayers' giving him a fund-raiser in his living room. If a Republican candidate had launched his political career at the home of an abortion-clinic bomber - even a repentant one - he would not have been able to run for dogcatcher in Podunk. And Ayers shows no remorse. His only regret is that he "didn't do enough." Why are these associations important? Do I think Obama is as corrupt as Rezko? Or shares Wright's angry racism or Ayers' unreconstructed 1960s radicalism? No. But that does not make these associations irrelevant. They tell us two important things about Obama. First, his cynicism and ruthlessness. He found these men useful, and use them he did. Would you attend a church whose pastor was spreading racial animosity from the pulpit? Would you even shake hands with - let alone serve on two boards with - an unrepentant terrorist, whether he bombed U.S. military installations or abortion clinics? Most Americans would not, on the grounds of sheer indecency. Yet Obama did, if not out of conviction, then out of expediency. He was a young man on the make, an unknown outsider working his way into Chicago politics. He played the game with everyone, without qualms and with obvious success. Obama is not the first politician to rise through a corrupt political machine. But he is one of the rare few to then have the audacity to present himself as a transcendent healer, hovering above and bringing redemption to the "old politics" - of the kind he had enthusiastically embraced in Chicago in the service of his own ambition. Second, and even more disturbing than the cynicism, is the window these associations give on Obama's core beliefs. He doesn't share Wright's poisonous views of race or Ayers' views, past and present, about the evil that is American society. But Obama clearly did not consider these views beyond the pale. For many years, he swam easily and without protest in that fetid pond. Until now. Today, on the threshold of the presidency, Obama concedes the odiousness of these associations, which is why he has severed them. But for the years in which he sat in Wright's pews and shared common purpose on boards with Ayers, Obama considered them a legitimate, indeed unremarkable, part of social discourse. Do you? Obama is a man of first-class intellect and first-class temperament. But his character remains highly suspect. There is a difference between temperament and character. Equanimity is a virtue. Tolerance of the obscene is not. Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago A truly independent site www.judicialwatch.com has some great stuff on many of our elected officials. It will make you sick and sad. Please vote wisely. It is sad that often times we must pick the lesser of the poor choices. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago abednigo2 says ...
I agree with that..................... Redneck I is...but bigot I taint! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Deb
|
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago prettykitty, someones been doing their homework!!! LOL Great posts, and very informative. Keep 'em coming! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago BethLPN47 says ...
Beth, I couldn't agree more....I wish more Americans couls take their blinders off. I, for one, don't watch any media reports on the election anymore. I had no idea how one sided everyting was until this election year. It makes me sick. ANY TIME a negative is brought out about Obama, it is conveniently overlooked, while McCain and Palin are slaughtered for even the smallest of offenses. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago nurseaisha says ...
This is what I want in office, someone to damn our country. Some to take us to socialized medicine. Which I have seen posts from Nurses for Obama they say they do not want it, they are not researching his budget plan. He wants to tax the rich and give to the poor. Last I heard poor people don't give people employment. Capitalism is what our country is founded on. I don't have a problem with rich or poor, but we need our rich to give us employment. BTW, look how socialistic anything has worked in these European countries. Hmmm. Its just a wait and see game at this point. I think we are in another Clinton situation. People are not voting for issues, they are voting personalities... Where did most of the jocks in your high school land??? That's what popularity gets you LOSERVILLE!!!!! |



